Italian Supreme Court Confirms Validity of Merger Leveraged Buyout

The Italian Supreme Court with judgment n. 1372 of January 21, 2011 confirmed that a merger leveraged buyout is not abusive in itself and can be respected for tax purposes. In the transaction under scrutiny, a company member of a group obtained a loan from a third party and purchased 100 per cent of the stock of another company member of the same group. Immediately after the acquisition and as part of the overall plan, the acquired company merged into the acquiring company. As a result, the acquiring company was able to use its acquisition interest expenses to offset the income of the target. Historically, leveraged buyout transaction had been challenged as elusive and tax deductions had been rejected by the tax administration. The Supreme Court's decision is important in the process of recognizing the general legitimacy of leveraged buyout arrangements in the Italian tax system.        

EU Outbound Merger Not Eligible For Tax-Free Treatment if No Permanent Establishment in Italy After the Merger

In ruling n. 21/E of January 27, 2009 (Resolution 21/E-2009.pdf), Italy's tax administration ruled on whether a merger of an Italian company into a Spanish parent would qualify for tax-free treatment under the EU merger directive.

Under the facts of the ruling, a Spanish company engaged in the business of distribution and sale of clothing and accessories would acquire the stock of an Italian company, which perform the following services:

- receipt of goods from Italian manufacturers and suppliers;

- storing and warehousing;

- quality and conformity control;

- packaging, shipping and delivery of goods to the parent or customers;

- collection and provision of information and other auxiliary services.

Immediately after the acquisition, in order to avoid administrative costs the Italian company would be merged into the Spanish company and would continue to operate as a permanent establishment in Italy of the Spanish company.

According to the taxpayer, the transaction should qualify as a tax free merger under the provisions of the EU merger directive as implemented in Italy.

Also, the Spanish company through its Italian permanent establishment should be able to purchase stock of other Italian companies and include them in a domestic tax consolidated group in Italy, with offset of profits and losses among the members of the group.

The Italian tax administration disagreed and ruled that the merger would be a taxable transaction and the Spanish company could not consolidate other Italian subsidiaries under Italian domestic tax consolidation rules.

According to the tax administration, after the merger there would be no permanent establishment of the foreign parent company in Italy, because the activities performed in Italy are excluded from the definition of permanent establishment provided for in the tax code.

Consequently, since the permanent establishment requirement is not met, the tax deferral treatment granted by the EU merger directive would not apply, and any gain or loss realized in the merger would have to be recognized for Italian tax purposes.  

 

 

 

Italian rules on EU cross-border mergers.

Italy implemented the EU merger directive (n. 90/434/CE) with Legislative Decree n. 544 of December 30, 1992.

More recently, Legislative Decree n. 199 of November 7, 2007 implemented the EU directive 2005/19/CE, which amended and extended the EU merger provisions to EU permanent establishments of EU companies. The Italian tax code provisions that incorporate the mergers directives are set forth in articles 178-181.

According to the above provisions, gains and losses realized on the transfer of the assets (including goodwill) of an Italian target company in a merger with an EU acquiring company are not recognized, if after the merger the foreign acquiring company operates through a permanent establishment in Italy to which the assets and liabilities of the Italian target company are attributed. The Italian permanent establishment takes a carryover basis in the assets transferred in the merger and recognition of gain or loss is deferred.

Definition of permanent establishment.

The Italian tax code provides a definition of permanent establishment at article 162. The definition is almost identical to the definition of permanent establishment contained in article 5 of the OECD's Model Tax  Convention.        

Paragraph 4 of tax code article 162 contain a list of activities that are not permanent establishment, even if they are carried out through a fixed place of business. The list corresponds to that contained in article 5, paragraph 3 of the OECD Model Convention.  

Use of a permanent establishment for planning purposes.

A permanent establishment can be used for several planning purposes under Italian law.

Just to mention a few, a permanent establishment is entitled to the tax exemption for dividends and gains from the sale of stock of Italian and foreign companies, and can consolidate other Italian companies under the Italian domestic tax consolidation regime (with offset of profits and losses among the members of the group).

On the contrary, dividends and gain from stock directly owned by a foreign company do not qualify for the participation exemption, and a foreign company cannot consolidate directly-owned Italian subsidiaries.  

Interest expenses allocated to a permanent establishment  are deductible and can reduce the profits of consolidated Italian subsidiaries owned through that permanent establishment.

Italian permanent establishments may be entitled to tax treaty benefits or to the non discrimination protection of the EC treaty as Italian domestic companies. 

If the Italian activities of a foreign taxpayer are not sufficient to create a permanent establishment in Italy within the definition of the tax code (as it is in the case discussed in the ruling), tax benefits can be lost.

Therefore, the actual existence of an Italian permanent establishment is an essential part of the planning strategy.

 

   

 

 

 

ECJ Ruled That Restriction to Tax-Free Treatment of Cross-Border Transfer of Shares is Illegal

On December 11, 2008 the European Court of Justice ("ECJ") issued its decision in case n. C-285/07 dealing with the tax treatment of a cross-border EU transfer of shares under German law.

The Court held that the requirement imposed under German law, according to which the shareholders of the transferred corporation ("target") are not taxed on the gain from the exchange of their shares in the target for the shares of the acquiring corporation, at the condition that the acquiring corporation takes a tax basis in the shares of the target equal to the transferring shareholder's tax basis in those shares prior to the transfer (carryover basis), violates the EU directive n. 90/434/CEE of July 23, 1990 (the "Mergers Directive") and EU law. 

The facts of the case concern a German public company which transferred a majority shareholding in a German private company to a French public company solely in exchange for stock of the French company. The German transferor took a tax basis in the stock of the French acquiring company received in the transaction, equal to the tax basis it had in the shares of the German transferred company (substituted basis). The French acquiring company carried the shares of the German acquired company at their fair market value at the time of the transaction. 

The EU mergers directive prescribes that, in order to qualify for tax free treatment and defer the tax on the gain from the exchange of stock in the target for stock of the acquiring company, the shareholders of the target company must take a substituted basis in the stock of the acquiring company received in the exchange. The directive is silent as to the tax basis at which the acquiring company should carry the stock of the acquired company received in the transaction. 

German law prescribed that the acquiring company took a carry over basis in the shares of the target (so called "double carry over basis requirement"). The position of the German government on the issue was that the EU directive is silent and the matter falls within the authority of the Member States.

The Court rejected the argument and held that the double carry over basis requirement imposed by German law violates the EU mergers directive and EU law in that it result in an undue restriction of a cross-border exchange of shares between to EU companies.

Italian law.

Italy implemented the EU mergers directive by way of legislative decree n. 544 of 1992. Recently, the EU mergers directive was amended and extended by Council Directive 2005/19/CE, implemented in Italy by way of Legislative Decree n. 199 of 2007.

In case of cross-border transfer of shares, Italy's tax administration with resolution n. 190 of December 13, 2000 took the position that shareholders of the target could achieve tax free treatment on their transfer of shares of the target for shares of the acquiring company at the condition that they took a substituted basis in the shares of the acquiring company and the acquiring took a carryover basis in the shares of the target received in the transaction.

Subsequently, with resolution n. 159 of July 25, 2007 the tax administration revoked its previous ruling and eliminated the double carryover basis requirement.

Consequently, Italian law is in line with the EU mergers directive and EC Treaty on this particular issue.